Bret Weinstein's Parental Rights Argument Has ONE Fatal Flaw

Anatomy of the Church and State

Bret Weinstein just argued natural law on parental rights 

and stopped just short of the Bible. When Tim Pool hit him with the trans surgery, vaccine, gotchas, both men argued morality without an anchor. In this reaction I break down their debate and deliver the Biblical Referee’s ruling on who actually owns our kids.

📖 SCRIPTURES REFERENCED

Leviticus 19:28 | Deuteronomy 6:6-7 | Deuteronomy 22:5 | Psalm 127:3 | Proverbs 24:11 | Romans 1:19-20 | Ephesians 6:4 | James 1:27

If Scripture’s verdict on parental rights hit you, drop your favorite authority verse in the comments, smash like, share this with one other parent, and subscribe — we drop the Referee’s ruling every week on government & culture through Scripture.

Follow me

• Youtube: @jeremiahcampana
• Rumble: @jesusandliberty
• Twitter: @jeremiahcampana
• Truth Social: @jesusandliberty
• Instagram:  @jeremiah_campana

Topic Timeline

00:00- intro

00:27- Bret walks into a trap

01:03- Important distinction

02:12 Scripture on disfgurement and cross dress

02:35- Bret Weinstein argues his moral view

03:54- Moraltiy is not a problem

05:45- Tim Pool challenges Bret's claims

08:31- Tolerate tragedy?

09:15- Bret argues Natural Law

10:47- Natural Law not good enough

11:28- Final verdict